My apologies--I am not ignoring you. Springtime here on the homestead means that I don't get to the computer every day, and the computer is much more reliable for producing typo-free writing thany phone.
The book is intended for teenagers and up, and it can get very dense. There is a little rough language, but not much, and the subject of sex comes up a few times in metaphor and as a subject of study. The overall tone and feel is similar to what you find in my longer think pieces here.
That said, quite a lot of it should be accessible to younger audiences, especially if an adult is facilitating. The only thing I can think of off the top of my head that may be problematic is the subsection on mentorship in the ethics chapter, late in the book. It includes a frank discussion of the complicated emotional dynamics that arise between mentors and proteges, but does not render a verdict on the legitimacy of romances in such situations (the point of the section is to prepare readers to wrestle with such decisions, rather than to make prescriptions).
Wow. Thank you for sharing with us. I'm going to love this.
So glad to have you along for the ride!
what ages is it suitable for? (thinking of reading it to my kids)
Forget I asked. Will just read it to them and see where it goes
My apologies--I am not ignoring you. Springtime here on the homestead means that I don't get to the computer every day, and the computer is much more reliable for producing typo-free writing thany phone.
The book is intended for teenagers and up, and it can get very dense. There is a little rough language, but not much, and the subject of sex comes up a few times in metaphor and as a subject of study. The overall tone and feel is similar to what you find in my longer think pieces here.
That said, quite a lot of it should be accessible to younger audiences, especially if an adult is facilitating. The only thing I can think of off the top of my head that may be problematic is the subsection on mentorship in the ethics chapter, late in the book. It includes a frank discussion of the complicated emotional dynamics that arise between mentors and proteges, but does not render a verdict on the legitimacy of romances in such situations (the point of the section is to prepare readers to wrestle with such decisions, rather than to make prescriptions).
Hope this is a useful answer :-)
thank you!
[See now that "forget I asked" sounds rude, but really did not mean to be]